Monday, April 29, 2024

FFA reject Culina claims

SoccerNews in General Soccer News 26 Dec 2011

48 Views

Football Federation Australia have rejected claims made by Professional Footballers Australia in relation to Jason Culina and his insurance battle.

The PFA – acting on behalf of Culina – served FFA with legal papers to reportedly sue the governing body for AU$1.7million after it was revealed the marquee player had not been insured since his return to the A-League.

According to the league’s collective bargaining agreement, the FFA are supposed to ensure that insurance is in place to cover wages for at least two years, in the case that a player is injured.

It is understood Gold Coast United failed to insure Culina when he was signed as their marquee player in 2009.

He picked up an injury at the 2011 Asian Cup in January and, as GCU had no insurance, they were forced to continue to pay his wages until he was released to sign with Newcastle.

But FFA hit back at claims on Monday morning.

“The PFA is trying to make out that this situation involving Jason Culina can be boiled down to a dispute between FFA and Jason over insurance,” said FFA head of corporate affairs and communications Kyle Patterson.

“This assertion is a red herring, a quite mischievous distraction from what’s happening. You have to question the PFA’s motives in running this line through the media.”

“FFA doesn’t intend to talk specifically about Jason’s case, other than to say our advice is that the Newcastle Jets have been meeting their obligations under Jason’s contract, as they should.”

“We also understand that Jason is working hard on his rehabilitation in order to get back into action, which is great news for Australian football.”

“Jason is one of the modern legends of the game with his service to the Qantas Socceroos in a golden era for the game. On behalf of the football community, we wish him well in his efforts to return to playing football.”

FFA also clarified the facts around insuring marquee players in the A-League.

“Any club that decides to contract a marquee player does so knowing they are responsible for all costs, including insurance, and any liabilities arising from that engagement,” the statement said.

“The cost of marquee players, as with the benefits, rest with the individual club, not the FFA or the Hyundai A-League or other clubs, some of whom have made the decision not to sign marquee players.”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

SoccerNews

Soccernews.com is news blog for soccer with comprehensive coverage of all the major leagues in Europe, as well as MLS in the United States. In addition we offer breaking news for transfers and transfer rumors, ticket sales, betting tips and offers, match previews, and in-depth editorials.

You can follow us on Facebook: Facebook.com/soccernews.com or Twitter: @soccernewsfeed.

SHARE OR COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

WE RECOMMEND

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This field is required *

Join the conversation!

or Register

Live Scores

advertisement

Betting Guide Advertisement

advertisement

Become a Writer
More More
Top