Friday, April 26, 2024

Why these sackings are bad for the game

The sackings of Luiz Felipe Scolari and Tony Adams on Monday were regarded by many as inevitable and most as sad.

Scolari had seven months and just twenty-five league games at Chelsea whilst Tony Adams was given just sixteen league games by the powers that be at Portsmouth.

Earlier on this season Paul Ince was sacked by Blackburn after just seventeen games in charge. The average tenure for a manager in England at the moment is just sixteen months. This has to be regarded as a worrying trend.

Failed

There is no doubt that all three of these managers were failing to produce the results and success that they themselves, the clubs and the fans would have liked, but surely they were not given enough time to prove themselves?

Paul Ince saw the formerly successful Blackburn side under Mark Hughes sink to the bottom of the table. Adams took Portsmouth from seventh in the table and being FA Cup holders to being one point off the drop zone and out of the FA Cup. Scolari saw Chelsea slip to fourth place in the table and begin to drift away in their title challenge.

There are three things involved in each of these sackings that are common to each and cause me to worry. The three strands running through each of these dismissals are:

  • 1. The money and success culture that has taken over the Premier League.
  • What have we done to our game when the money that would be lost by relegation or by failing to qualify for the top European competition is so important that people no longer matter and success, or the prevention of failure, must be achieved at any cost.

    In the Premier League, only four teams can qualify for the Champions League and three clubs will definitely be relegated to the Championship. It seems now that if you are a top half team but fail get into Europe or a bottom half team falling into the inevitable relegation battle, you are defined as a failure and thrown out. That cannot be good for our game.

  • 2. Player power.
  • Players have a great deal of power in the modern game. Despite the claims of a certain Fifa official in the summer that some players were being treated like slaves by their club, the fact is that it is the players who hold all the aces. The Bosman ruling in relation to contracts and transfers has put the players in charge. Now, it seems, the players have a fairly big say in who the manager should be. That has to be the wrong way round.

    At Blackburn some players were beginning to go public in their dislike of Ince’s methods. Once the media got hold of the fact that Ince had ‘lost the dressing room’ his position became untenable. The players know that and a phone call to a trusted journalist seems to be a disingenuous and easy way to start the process of getting a change of manager.

    At Portsmouth the players seemed to be supportive to Tony Adams on the surface, but the fact that Diarra and Defoe left the club and other players were seriously under performing for the manager were major contributory parts to his downfall.

    Chelsea are well known for the high levels of player power at their club. Mourinho felt he was forced out by some of the players, Grant certainly was and now we hear that Abramovich consulted certain senior players about Scolari. However much a certain player ‘bleeds blue’ and ‘loves the club’ he should not weald the power that he apparently does. Will the new manager be OK as long as a certain defender supports him?

  • 3. The fans reaction to the decisions.
  • I think for me the most worrying of the three strands is the reaction of the fans. Whilst some fans have come out and said that the managers have been unlucky and deserved a longer period to try to establish their teams and their methods, many have just said, ‘good’.

    I can only assume that some fans of Blackburn, Portsmouth and Chelsea have very short memories or have only become supporters since the clubs found success.

    The joy of supporting a football club is that you experience all the emotions. You love the highs and you hate the lows but you support your team through thick and thin. Now it seems that if you seem to be heading into the slightest low, fans are not prepared to accept this as part of football and start to demand the head of the manager. Once again, this can’t be right.

    Argument

    It is an old argument but you only have to look at the success of clubs like Manchester United, Arsenal and Everton, who have given their managers all the time in the world to get things right. Look at what has happened to Bolton and Charlton since their long term managers left. Many people are calling for Gareth Southgate’s head but can anyone be sure that Middlesbrough won’t sink without a trace if he leaves?

    Like most managers, Sir Alex Ferguson was surprised and disappointed with the decision to sack Scolari.

    “It is a sign of the times. There is absolutely no patience in the world now. There was great expectation at Chelsea that they were going to do well this year – and it is only this last month they have had a bad spell. The judgment really is only on the last month.”

    Perhaps the worst culprit in all of this is Roman Abramovich. Here is a man who bought a club because he could and he wanted to. It was a toy for him, but it had to be a successful toy and it had to be his. With no regard for the traditions or the culture of the game he set about trying to buy his success. It is like a rich gambler going into a casino but only betting if he knows the game is rigged in his favour.

    Had to go

    Ranieri only managed second place and a Champions League semi-final so he had to go. Mourinho was OK for a while, six trophies in three years but no Champions League success and he was bigger than Abramovich so he had to go as well. Avram Grant could only manage second place in the league and defeat in the Champions League final so there was no question of him staying. Now, Scolari has had twenty-five league games in charge and Chelsea find themselves in the terrible position of being in fourth place and some seven points behind the leaders. No wonder he has had to go as well!

    Jealous

    Maybe as a Watford fan I am just jealous of the success these other teams have had. Maybe if Abramovich had bought Watford instead and we were somewhere near where Chelsea are, I would feel differently. I don’t think I would, but I am unlikely to ever know!

    I just think that the current situation is sad for English football.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Graham Fisher


    SHARE OR COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

    WE RECOMMEND

    • Brad Lovell

      0 0

      good point kenmwu. I too am a Man united fan, though i live in the US. but my mothers side of the family came from manchester and supported MU. ive been with them since i was born, and my parents told me that i actually sounded like i was cussin at chelsea ( the team i hate the most, like u) when i saw MUs disaster in october of 97 or 98 against chelsea, 5-0. i was 3 back then….
      inded MU and arsenal are so successful, even though arsenal aint doin so goood right now, is because they have a experianced manager, and experianced coaches all the time.
      and it is disappointin to see scolari leave, when he arived i hoped he would of done somthin to make games between MU and cfc more interestin. after the game in january, i saw that he might be worse than mourinho. 2-0 loss to liverpool almost proved it.

    • chelski

      0 0

      the chelsea goals are simply unreachable.if you simply look at what abhramovich wants:
      get efficient results (pl win,fa cup win,finals in cl at least),AND play good football, chelski is just like real madrid of spain, though the chelseasquad is better, it just has to require their full potential, and this could only be done if the players has no power at all. look at what jurgen klinsmann did in germany(not that i would like him).
      he simply regards players like ballack as shit. same goes for loew.
      though, i wonder,chelski has sure to buy some new players and talents, but they wont. their players will get older and older, they should look not to become the second milan =)

    • kenmwu

      0 0

      I’m in no way a Chelsea fan, been a Man United fan since I was 7, and with their emergence into championship contenders over the past 9 years has made them my most hated team in the league. But I do enjoy the rivalry year in year out between the two clubs because obviously it creates entertaining football. I get a sense of excitement whenever they recruit a new talent. So this past summer when I heard Scolari was going to Stamford, I was excited. I was sure he would be given time to build the team he wants and would make this a very exciting season. When I heard he was fired, I was outraged. A quality coach sacked because he wasn’t getting his team where they wanted fast enough. I was born in England but now I live in Canada, and have become a fan of North American sports like hockey and football. And it seems this trend has become a worldwide phenomenom. In Canada I am a fan of the Vancouver Canucks, and 2 seasons ago we were cup contenders after hiring a new coach and a new General Manager. Then last season we didn’t make the playoffs and it seems everything our coach did the season before meant absolutely nothing, and word of him getting the boot was bubbling. We fired the GM who made us cup contenders in the first place, and the coach slipped the cracks and stayed at the club. This season we were doing great and looking like cup contenders again after a rebuilding of the club and the coach wasn’t mentioned or thanked at all for turning this team around. But when we went on a 8 game losing streak, and now once again there are talks about sacking the coach. Its not only in football but all sports where as soon as a team is not doing well, there is no time for forgiveness or patience for a turn around. The coach/manager must be sacked and replaced so someone can come in and make a quick fix. There is a reason clubs like Manchester United and Arsenal are successful. They have one man season in, season out, with one vision, and as time goes on, gets to build and create his vision of a successful team. I believe if this method is applied to all sports teams, there will be stronger and more solid teams everywhere.

    • Graham Fisher

      0 0

      Franco,

      That’s a decent point about the press. They certainly do create a great deal of speculation and uncertainty with the never ending speculation and rumour that they create at every opportunity.

      I guess even websites such as this one have to hold their hands up a little to that accusation.

    • FRANCO

      0 0

      Oh iam surprised by your article. I think the press starts the panic and then still end up blaming the club owner/s for sacking the manager. The press usually have a field day speculating who will be first or next sacked week after week during and off season. I think Chelsea should just go back to get Mourinho. He will win them trophies but surely without exciting football as you see Liverpool, Arsenal or even Man U exhibit. But then, Chelsea will end up winniing the most trophies and that is enough excitement for the fans. The league will be more entertaining overall than it is now. The press should just stop the pointless speculations over managers’ jobs and theses crazy sackings will be minimised.

    • shoes

      0 0

      I am not that happy with the sacking of Scolari but i knew that one of the good days the under performance of Chesea will lead to him being fired.

    • shoes

      0 0

      I am not that happy with the sacking of Scolari but i knew that one of the good days the under performance of Chesea will lead to him being fired.

    • FRANCO

      0 0

      Oh iam surprised by your article. I think the press starts the panic and then still end up blaming the club owner/s for sacking the manager. The press usually have a field day speculating who will be first or next sacked week after week during and off season. I think Chelsea should just go back to get Mourinho. He will win them trophies but surely without exciting football as you see Liverpool, Arsenal or even Man U exhibit. But then, Chelsea will end up winniing the most trophies and that is enough excitement for the fans. The league will be more entertaining overall than it is now. The press should just stop the pointless speculations over managers’ jobs and theses crazy sackings will be minimised.

    • Graham Fisher

      0 0

      Franco,

      That’s a decent point about the press. They certainly do create a great deal of speculation and uncertainty with the never ending speculation and rumour that they create at every opportunity.

      I guess even websites such as this one have to hold their hands up a little to that accusation.

    • kenmwu

      0 0

      I’m in no way a Chelsea fan, been a Man United fan since I was 7, and with their emergence into championship contenders over the past 9 years has made them my most hated team in the league. But I do enjoy the rivalry year in year out between the two clubs because obviously it creates entertaining football. I get a sense of excitement whenever they recruit a new talent. So this past summer when I heard Scolari was going to Stamford, I was excited. I was sure he would be given time to build the team he wants and would make this a very exciting season. When I heard he was fired, I was outraged. A quality coach sacked because he wasn’t getting his team where they wanted fast enough. I was born in England but now I live in Canada, and have become a fan of North American sports like hockey and football. And it seems this trend has become a worldwide phenomenom. In Canada I am a fan of the Vancouver Canucks, and 2 seasons ago we were cup contenders after hiring a new coach and a new General Manager. Then last season we didn’t make the playoffs and it seems everything our coach did the season before meant absolutely nothing, and word of him getting the boot was bubbling. We fired the GM who made us cup contenders in the first place, and the coach slipped the cracks and stayed at the club. This season we were doing great and looking like cup contenders again after a rebuilding of the club and the coach wasn’t mentioned or thanked at all for turning this team around. But when we went on a 8 game losing streak, and now once again there are talks about sacking the coach. Its not only in football but all sports where as soon as a team is not doing well, there is no time for forgiveness or patience for a turn around. The coach/manager must be sacked and replaced so someone can come in and make a quick fix. There is a reason clubs like Manchester United and Arsenal are successful. They have one man season in, season out, with one vision, and as time goes on, gets to build and create his vision of a successful team. I believe if this method is applied to all sports teams, there will be stronger and more solid teams everywhere.

    • chelski

      0 0

      the chelsea goals are simply unreachable.if you simply look at what abhramovich wants:
      get efficient results (pl win,fa cup win,finals in cl at least),AND play good football, chelski is just like real madrid of spain, though the chelseasquad is better, it just has to require their full potential, and this could only be done if the players has no power at all. look at what jurgen klinsmann did in germany(not that i would like him).
      he simply regards players like ballack as shit. same goes for loew.
      though, i wonder,chelski has sure to buy some new players and talents, but they wont. their players will get older and older, they should look not to become the second milan =)

    • Brad Lovell

      0 0

      good point kenmwu. I too am a Man united fan, though i live in the US. but my mothers side of the family came from manchester and supported MU. ive been with them since i was born, and my parents told me that i actually sounded like i was cussin at chelsea ( the team i hate the most, like u) when i saw MUs disaster in october of 97 or 98 against chelsea, 5-0. i was 3 back then….
      inded MU and arsenal are so successful, even though arsenal aint doin so goood right now, is because they have a experianced manager, and experianced coaches all the time.
      and it is disappointin to see scolari leave, when he arived i hoped he would of done somthin to make games between MU and cfc more interestin. after the game in january, i saw that he might be worse than mourinho. 2-0 loss to liverpool almost proved it.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This field is required *

    Join the conversation!

    or Register

    More More
    Top